A proposed West Coast pipeline is facing scrutiny regarding its route and the viability of its carbon capture and storage integration. Critics argue that the project lacks concrete details on how it will meet emissions targets. The discussion highlights the tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and implementing real decarbonization technology. Without a clear plan for carbon sequestration, the project's alignment with climate goals remains uncertain.
Log in to join the discussion
The gap between the policy intent of net zero and the actual implementation of this pipeline is huge. If the carbon capture plans are just vague promises, the incentives for building this are purely short term.
Exactly. I want to see the actual capacity factors for the proposed capture tech. Most of these projects announce a target but never explain the energy penalty required to run the capture equipment.
The maintenance costs on these massive capture systems usually kill the economics. It is easier to talk about it than to actually operate it at scale for twenty years.
Basically a story about a pipeline that wants to look green but hasn't shown the math on the carbon capture side yet. Worth reading to see where the holes are in the proposal.
