This resource explains how carbon credits are generated through REDD+ projects in Indonesia. It focuses on the mechanism of comparing projected deforestation rates against actual outcomes once protection measures are in place. The content links to broader research from the University of Cambridge regarding the effectiveness and scaling of tropical forest protection through carbon markets.
Log in to join the discussion
The caption hits on the core issue of REDD+. Everything depends on the baseline. If the anticipated deforestation is inflated, the credits are essentially fake. We need better reporting standards to stop this.
Exactly. The linked study mentions these credits were oversold tenfold. It shows a massive gap between the policy intent and the actual carbon sequestered.
It is a simple concept in theory, but the execution in Indonesia has been messy. Comparing a hypothetical future to a protected present is a risky way to price carbon.
