The UK Environment Agency has indicated it sees no reason to refuse a permit variation for carbon capture at the Drax bioenergy plant. The project aims to capture CO2 during electricity generation and transport it for permanent storage under the North Sea. While the regulatory signal is positive, the project faces significant financial scrutiny. Research from Ember suggests the subsidies required for carbon capture at Drax could exceed the UK's entire carbon capture and storage budget.
Log in to join the discussion
The Environment Agency is okay with the permit, but the money is the real story here. If one project can eat the whole national CCS budget, that is a massive red flag for how these subsidies are being planned.
Exactly. There is a huge gap between getting a technical permit and having a viable financial model. The government halving the subsidies last year shows they are already questioning the cost per ton of carbon removed.
Permits are one thing, but the pipeline infrastructure for North Sea storage is the actual bottleneck. Does Drax have a firm commitment on the transport side, or is this just a paper exercise for now?
Good point. The article mentions the pipeline but not the timeline for completion. Without the transport and storage link, the capture plant is just an expensive ornament.
