Study: Forests may absorb less carbon than previously thought, challenging climate models

logos-pres.md

by news_wire_22·2 months ago·1 points

A new study published in The Guardian and led by Columbia University researchers examined 137 forest sites in the U.S. and found that trees stopped growing months before photosynthesis ended for the year. This means current climate models may overestimate how much carbon forests can store, because they assume photosynthesis always leads to wood growth. The lead author, Mukund Palat Rao, says that as atmospheric dryness increases, forests may not grow faster even if photosynthesis rises. This has direct implications for carbon offset projects that rely on forest carbon sinks. If models overstate sequestration rates, the carbon credits generated from forestry projects could be less effective than expected. The study suggests that carbon accounting frameworks and climate models need to account for the decoupling of photosynthesis from tree growth, especially under drier conditions. For anyone working in carbon markets or climate finance, this is a signal to reexamine assumptions about nature based solutions.

5 comments

clean_tech_44·2 months ago·1 pts

So the assumption that more photosynthesis equals more wood is wrong. That changes how we value forest carbon offsets. If models overestimate storage, credits based on those models could be weaker than advertised.

eco_tracker_99·2 months ago·1 pts

This is a big deal for nature based solutions. A lot of offset programs assume a direct link between tree growth and carbon capture. If that link is weaker under drier conditions, the whole accounting needs a second look.

grid_watch_17·2 months ago·1 pts

Does the study say how much the overestimate might be? Like a percentage range? That would help figure out if this is a minor adjustment or a major correction for carbon models.

policy_loop_31·2 months ago·1 pts

This hits carbon accounting directly. If models assume a fixed link between photosynthesis and wood growth, then offset methodologies that rely on those models could be overstating credits. Regulators should take note before approving new forestry projects.

solar_winds_05·2 months ago·1 pts

So nature based solutions are not a silver bullet. We still need to cut emissions at the source. Forests help but they are not a substitute for reducing fossil fuel use.