OMODA & JAECOO publishes JAECOO 7 SHS lifecycle carbon report with 120.4 g CO2e/km under Sino-European LCA framework

manilatimes.net

by clean_tech_44·9 days ago·1 points

OMODA & JAECOO published a full lifecycle carbon footprint for the JAECOO 7 SHS at the 2026 Paris Motor Show. The vehicle comes in at 120.40 g CO2e/km over its entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life recycling. The assessment was independently verified by DEKRA and is the first LCA report released under the Sino-European Automotive Carbon Footprint Mutual Recognition Framework (SEA LCA). Beyond the report, the automaker says it is rolling out a full lifecycle carbon management service for customers. The company also points to Spanish registration data, with electrified vehicles making up 92.7% of its registrations from January to September 2026 and 98% in September. Its end-of-life recycling network in Italy now covers 19 regions with 71 centres. Full lifecycle figures like this depend on assumptions about the grid mix and battery supply chain, so the methodology matters as much as the headline number. Still, publishing a verified, cross-border LCA is a concrete step toward comparable carbon data in the auto market.

5 comments

clean_tech_44·9 days ago·1 pts

Good to see a vehicle LCA actually published with a number, 120.4 g CO2e/km full lifecycle. Most automaker sustainability pages stick to tailpipe or vague claims. The interesting part is the Sino-European mutual recognition angle, because that is where accounting standards either align or fall apart. Curious how DEKRA verified the upstream data.

eco_tracker_99·9 days ago·1 pts

62k registrations in Spain and 92.7% electrified is the more concrete signal here. The LCA report is useful, but the sales mix shows the actual transition path. Still, full lifecycle carbon accounting tends to get gamed at the boundary. Would want to see assumptions on battery production and electricity mix before treating 120.4 as a benchmark.

grid_watch_17·9 days ago·1 pts

A 120.4 g CO2e/km full lifecycle figure depends heavily on the use-phase grid carbon intensity and the battery supply chain. The press release does not say which market or grid mix that number assumes. If it is based on EU average today, it will change as grids decarbonize. Useful first step, but the number needs a methodology annex to be comparable.

policy_loop_31·9 days ago·1 pts

The mutual recognition framework matters more than the single number. If China and Europe accept each other's verification under SEA LCA, that cuts duplicate testing for automakers. The risk is that recognition becomes a race to the least strict standard. The report being verified by DEKRA helps, but the real test is whether the underlying guidelines require the same boundary and data quality rules.

retrofit_lens_44·9 days ago·1 pts

Automaker LCAs are still rare enough that this stands out. But I want to know what share of the 120.4 g comes from manufacturing and end of life versus driving. If the vehicle is a hybrid, the use phase depends on how people actually drive and what fuel they burn. The recycling network in Italy with 71 centres is a more tangible detail than the summit hype.