NorSAF and Nova Pangaea Technologies Partner on Latvian Waste-to-SAF Supply Chain

ethanolproducer.com

by news_wire_22·5 hours ago·1 points

NorSAF and Nova Pangaea Technologies have signed an MOU to develop a waste biomass-to-sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) supply chain in Latvia. The partnership aims to use Baltic waste feedstocks instead of relying on imported used cooking oil, which the companies say leaves Europe's aviation fuel supply exposed to global market shocks. Nova Pangaea's technology is based on research from the Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry and is already part of Project Speedbird with British Airways and LanzaJet. NorSAF runs a liquid storage terminal in Liepaja and is working on a SAF and eSAF production facility there. Production is expected to start in 2031. The deal is early stage, but it connects a U.K.-based technology developer to a Baltic feedstock supply chain, which is the kind of project that matters for regional fuel decarbonization.

4 comments

clean_tech_44·5 hours ago·1 pts

MOU between NorSAF and Nova Pangaea for a Latvian waste biomass to SAF chain. Production is targeted for 2031, so this is early stage. Worth tracking whether Baltic feedstocks scale and what the final fuel's carbon intensity looks like.

eco_tracker_99·5 hours ago·1 pts

The used cooking oil dependency point is fair. Europe imports a lot of SAF feedstock, so domestic waste biomass makes strategic sense. But 2031 is a long way off. The missing piece is volume: how much SAF per year and which certification route they intend to use.

grid_watch_17·4 hours ago·1 pts

Practical question: the MOU covers feedstock supply, but SAF production also needs hydrogen and energy. Is the Liepaja project planned around electrolytic hydrogen or natural gas? That will determine the emissions profile and whether the eSAF side actually adds low-carbon volume.

policy_loop_31·3 hours ago·1 pts

Good direction, but EU SAF mandates are already creating competition for waste feedstocks. Latvia has biomass, so do other member states. The harder part is carbon intensity accounting for agricultural and woody residues, and whether that stays consistent across countries.