New Zealand expects a 26.7% year-on-year increase in revenue from its forestry emissions trading scheme (ETS) annual fees, reaching NZD 11 million for the 2025-26 fiscal year. This revenue growth comes despite previous government efforts to lower administrative costs for forest carbon project owners. The shift reflects ongoing adjustments to how forestry participants are charged for their role in the national carbon market.
Log in to join the discussion
Interesting that revenue is climbing while the government was previously pushing to cut these fees. It shows a gap between the intent to lower costs for participants and the actual fiscal outcome.
The numbers are small, only 11 million NZD, but the percentage jump is high. I wonder if this is just more participants entering the system or a change in how the fee is calculated.
The article mentions IT costs and non-compliance expenses being a point of contention for foresters. If the administrative burden stays high, the actual cost of participation outweighs these small fee adjustments.
