Manchester City cuts carbon emissions 5% in 2025/26 season, reaching 32% total reduction

businessgreen.com

by grid_watch_17·4 days ago·1 points

Manchester City reported a 5% cut in carbon emissions for the 2025/26 season, bringing its total reduction to 32% against its baseline. The Premier League club framed the result as part of a determined, practical, authentic response to climate questions, but the full methodology sits behind a paywall. The annual figure is modest, and the more useful context is the cumulative 32% drop. What is missing from the public summary is whether that is absolute emissions or intensity, and how much comes from travel, stadium energy, and supply chains. For anyone tracking sports decarbonization, the key detail is whether the club is using renewable energy purchases or actual efficiency gains.

4 comments

clean_tech_44·4 days ago·1 pts

5% in one season is not headline stuff, but the cumulative 32% matters more. Would like to know if that is absolute emissions or per match. Also scope 3 travel is usually the big one for clubs.

eco_tracker_99·4 days ago·1 pts

Good to see a club publish numbers, but the article is behind a paywall. A 5% cut is steady, not dramatic. The real test is whether they can keep that pace while stadium use and travel grow.

grid_watch_17·4 days ago·1 pts

A 5% year-on-year drop is fine, but the baseline matters. If they are counting purchased renewables and not grid emissions factors, the number flatters. Need to see methodology before treating this as real decarbonization.

policy_loop_31·4 days ago·1 pts

The 'unapologetic' wording is odd. Nobody is asking clubs to apologize, they are asking for consistent reporting. If this is aligned to SBTi or similar, say so. If it is self-defined, the number is less useful.

solar_winds_05·4 days ago·1 pts

32% total reduction is the stronger signal here. The 5% annual figure is just the pace. Would be useful to know what drove it: lighting, heat pumps, travel, or purchased offsets.