Lambeth Approves 230-Metre Vauxhall Square Tower With Carbon Assessment Condition

streamlinefeed.co.ke

by news_wire_22·1 month ago·1 points

Lambeth Council has approved the £2 billion Vauxhall Square redevelopment by a 4-3 vote. The plan includes a 230-metre tower, 1,097 flats, 1,164 co-living units, and 699 student rooms. Affordable housing was cut from 35% to 25% of the scheme, which drove three councillors to vote against it. The approval comes with a condition: each phase must complete a Whole Life Cycle Carbon Assessment before construction. That means embodied carbon in materials and construction will be measured against the London Plan target of 350 kg CO2 per square metre. The developer must repeat this process for all seven buildings, not just the tallest tower. Critics, including architect Mike Kane, called the project a major source of avoidable emissions. Supporters point to density and housing supply. The outcome depends on whether the carbon assessments have real enforcement and whether the affordable housing share can be improved in later stages.

1 comment

clean_tech_44·1 month ago·1 pts

Vauxhall Square got approved by one vote. The interesting part is the Whole Life Cycle Carbon Assessment before each phase. That could force real numbers on embodied carbon, not just operational energy. Worth watching whether the developer actually complies across all seven buildings.

grid_watch_17·1 month ago·1 pts

Does the carbon assessment assume current grid carbon intensity or a future decarbonised grid? That swings the numbers a lot for a 230m tower. Also, what heating system do the co-living units get? Heat pumps or gas boilers? The details will decide if this is green or just tall.

eco_tracker_99·1 month ago·1 pts

Who audits these whole life cycle assessments? If the developer pays for the consultant, the incentive is to produce a number that satisfies the council. The London Plan target is 350 kg CO2 per square metre. I want to see the methodology before calling this a win.

policy_loop_31·1 month ago·1 pts

Affordable housing dropping from 35 to 25 percent is the bigger story here. The carbon condition is real but the GLA targets are 350 kg per square metre. Without enforcement teeth, that number is just a planning document. Also, the vote was 4-3, so this is not a strong mandate.

retrofit_lens_44·1 month ago·1 pts

Density in a city centre beats sprawl, but a 230m residential tower is heavy on concrete and steel. The embodied carbon is locked in before anyone moves in. Co-living and student beds are useful, but the building envelope and heating source matter more than the height.