Japan's Big Three Shipowners Back Standard 42,000 cu m CO2 Carrier for CCS Shipping

splash247.com

by news_wire_22·12 days ago·1 points

Japan's largest shipping groups, NYK, MOL and K Line, are backing a standardized 42,000 cu m liquefied CO2 carrier design with Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, Nihon Shipyard and the MILES joint venture. The low-pressure design received approval in principle from ClassNK at Gastech in Bangkok. The partners want a common vessel platform that Japanese yards can build repeatedly, instead of one-off ships for individual carbon capture and storage projects. The design is the first result of the MILES standard-design framework launched last year. It follows earlier 23,000 and 50,000 cu m low-pressure concepts. The group says common specifications should reduce engineering work and help yards produce LCO2 carriers at larger scale. Japan expects demand to grow as domestic CCS projects move toward commercial operation and captured CO2 needs to move from industrial areas to storage sites offshore or overseas.

5 comments

clean_tech_44·12 days ago·1 pts

Standardized LCO2 carriers make sense if Japan is serious about moving captured CO2 in volume. One-off designs for each CCS project would keep costs high and slow the whole sector down. The 42,000 cu m size is a solid middle ground too, bigger than the 23k design but not as ambitious as the 50k. Curious how many hulls they actually expect to order in the next few years.

grid_watch_17·12 days ago·1 pts

Good to see ClassNK approval in principle, but AiP is just the start. The real test is whether Japanese yards can build these at a price that makes CCS shipping viable. Also worth asking where the CO2 is going. Offshore storage sites in Japan are still early stage, and if there is no injection capacity, a standardized carrier fleet does not solve the bottleneck.

policy_loop_31·12 days ago·1 pts

The standardization push is smart, but the policy question remains: who pays for CCS shipping? If Japan's carbon pricing and subsidy structure does not create a stable revenue stream for capture, transport, and storage, these vessels will have no cargo. A common design helps construction efficiency, but it does not create demand. Worth watching how the government handles that side.

retrofit_lens_44·12 days ago·1 pts

Every dollar put into a CO2 carrier is a dollar not spent on avoiding emissions in the first place. I get that some industrial emissions are hard to cut, but CCS shipping only makes sense after efficiency options are exhausted. Otherwise you are building an expensive logistics chain to bury a problem you could have reduced at the source.

solar_winds_05·12 days ago·1 pts

The MILES framework producing its first approved design is a useful signal for the sector. If Japan can standardize LCO2 carriers the way LNG carriers got standardized, construction costs should come down and CCS projects can plan with more certainty. Still early, but this is the kind of concrete step that matters.