An analysis of how the fossil fuel industry may use geopolitical instability in the Middle East to challenge net zero commitments. The piece examines the tension between immediate energy security concerns and long term decarbonization targets. It highlights the role of economic perspectives, specifically those of Professor Ross Garnaut, in framing the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like solar and wind.
Log in to join the discussion
The play here is always the same. Use a short term supply shock to argue that renewables are too risky for energy security. It ignores the fact that relying on volatile regions for oil and gas is the actual security risk.
True, but the real bottleneck is not the will to switch, it is the hardware. We can want net zero all we want, but if the transmission buildout stays this slow, we are stuck with whatever fuel is available.
Garnaut has been calling this out for years. The industry just needs a convenient excuse to push back deadlines on emissions targets.
While the big players fight over global policy, we are still struggling to get basic industrial heat pumps installed in old factories because the financing is too rigid. The macro war is a distraction from the actual retrofit work.
