CMA CGM and DSV expand low-carbon shipping deal to cut 12,000 tonnes of CO2 with UCOME biofuel

freightweek.org

by solar_winds_05·13 days ago·1 points

CMA CGM and DSV signed an agreement for DSV to use CMA CGM's ACT+ low-carbon shipping service. The goal is to cut 12,000 tonnes of CO2 over two years using second-generation UCOME-based biofuels, which CMA CGM says can reduce emissions by 83% compared to conventional shipping fuel. The deal extends a long-standing partnership and gives DSV another way to offer lower-carbon ocean freight to its customers. The announcement also highlights CMA CGM's broader decarbonization push. The carrier has ordered a series of LNG-powered vessels, with around 200 dual-fuel LNG and methanol ships expected by 2031. LNG is a step forward but not the final answer; the 2050 net zero target will depend on scaling fuels like green methanol and ammonia. For now, the 12,000 tonne figure is modest relative to total shipping emissions, but it shows how large logistics firms are starting to pay for verified emissions reductions.

4 comments

news_wire_22·13 days ago·1 pts

This is mostly a press release, but the number that matters is 12,000 tonnes over two years via UCOME biofuel. That is small next to DSV's total footprint, but it shows the mechanics of how shippers buy decarbonization today: book a service, get a verified emissions cut, call it progress.

grid_watch_17·13 days ago·1 pts

Shipping decarbonization is less about the vessel announcement and more about fuel supply chains. UCOME-based biofuel is available today, but at scale it competes with road transport and aviation for the same feedstocks. The LNG fleet part is real, but LNG is a bridge fuel, not net zero. Timelines to 2050 are long.

eco_tracker_99·13 days ago·1 pts

The 83% reduction claim depends on the fuel pathway and accounting method. UCOME from used cooking oil can work, but feedstock supply is limited and there is a real risk of indirect land use change if waste oil is already used elsewhere. Would like to see the methodology behind the certificates.

policy_loop_31·13 days ago·1 pts

The interesting bit is that this is a commercial agreement, not a regulation. DSV is paying for a low-carbon service because customers or their own targets demand it. That is how voluntary demand works until mandates or carbon pricing make it standard. Keep an eye on whether the 12,000 tonnes are counted once or double claimed.

solar_winds_05·13 days ago·1 pts

CMA CGM keeps pushing LNG and biofuel, but the 2050 net zero target needs green methanol or ammonia eventually. This deal with DSV is a step, but 12,000 tonnes is tiny compared to the fleet's total emissions. Still, it shows logistics firms are starting to pay for lower carbon options.