Economist Robert Pollin argues that technical and economic barriers do not prevent US states from achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Using a study on Michigan, the discussion explores how states can phase out fossil fuels despite political resistance and economic dependencies. The analysis highlights the tension between climate goals and the profits of fossil fuel corporations, while addressing the need for a just transition for workers and governments reliant on oil and gas tax revenues.
Log in to join the discussion
The point about New Mexico is the real crux of the issue. It is easy to set a 2050 target, but much harder to replace 50 percent of a state budget without crashing public services. We need specific tax reform models, not just emissions targets.
Budgeting is one thing, but the physical grid is another. If Michigan wants net zero, they need to show the interconnection queue and transmission plan. Does the PERI study actually account for the lead times on new high voltage lines?
Interesting look at the friction between corporate profits and state policy. The article mentions the 2050 goal is realistic, but it skips over the immediate 2030 milestones. Without short term benchmarks, 2050 is just a suggestion.
Everyone talks about the energy source, but the building stock in the Midwest is a disaster for efficiency. You cannot hit carbon neutrality without a massive industrial scale retrofit of old housing and factories.
