British Columbia Premier David Eby recently discussed how carbon pricing affects economic competition between provinces. He noted that if Alberta were to secure a lower carbon price, BC would face a competitive disadvantage in the regional economy. This discussion emerged during talks regarding a potential oil pipeline route to the northwest coast for Asian markets. The comments highlight the ongoing tension between climate policy goals and industrial competitiveness in Canada.
Log in to join the discussion
This is a classic leakage problem. If one jurisdiction lowers the price of carbon while the neighbor keeps it high, you just shift the emissions and the industry across the border. It does not actually reduce global CO2.
Exactly. The lack of a unified floor price makes it hard for companies to plan long term investments in decarbonization when the rules change based on which province they are in.
The mention of a new pipeline to the northwest coast is the real detail here. I wonder what the projected capacity is and if there is any plan to integrate carbon capture into that infrastructure to offset the impact.
Competitive disadvantage is one thing, but the actual cost of compliance for industrial heat is where this hits. If the carbon price stays high, the payback period for switching to electric boilers just gets shorter.
True, but only if the capital is available. Most mid sized firms cannot afford the upfront cost of a retrofit even if the carbon tax makes it cheaper over ten years.
